|
Why Choose CWA?
by Roxana Cárdenas
CFI/BACI have launched a card signing campaign
to choose our representative for collective bargaining and employer-employee
relations. CFI/BACI are asking interpreters to choose the Communication
Workers of America (CWA). Although CFI/BACI are currently affiliated
with CWA, interpreters must still formally select our exclusive
representative in each region by signing authorization cards.
BACI and CFI entered intoour affiliation
agreements with CWA in 1999 and 2000 respectively and we accomplished
our goal of gaining employee status together with CWA. No other
union was up to the task.
Affiliation with CWA was not the result of
a rash decision. It was preceded by decades of labor relations activity
and union research by interpreters dating back to the mid-70's when
Los Angeles County Administration customarily negotiated
contracts with interpreters.
In the mid-80's, GLAC, the Greater Los Angeles
Chapter of the CCIA (CFI's predecessor), continued to participate
in the collective bargaining process. GLAC sought direction from
other county court unions such as Service Employees International
Union (SEIU). SEIU's Local 660 informed interpreters that since
interpreters were not employees and that only employees could be
unionized, they weren't interested in unionizing us.
The early 90's signaled the end of collective
bargaining between L.A. Court Administration and court interpreters,
in part due to a comprehensive audit of the Los Angeles courts by
the IRS. In response to a membership vote, GLAC commenced a long
struggle to gain an employment identity through a writ of mandate,
which would force the county to negotiate with us once again. Although
we lost, we were directed by the judge to pursue legislative remedy.
During this period of time, talks with SEIU
Local 535 did not lead to anything concrete. SEIU, Local 660, rejected
us one final time because organizing us was not financially feasible
for them.
In 1999 and 2000, BACI and CFI defined our
needs with regard to a union. We wanted financial and legal support
from a union, but we did not want to compromise
our membership's autonomy in forging our own destiny as a profession.
We wanted to be able to form our own local and attract a union that
was not dissuaded by our
non-employee status. CWA fit all these criteria.
CWA is the largest communications and media
union in the United States. It represents more than 700,000 professionals
such as university professionals, researchers and technical employees
in the University of California system, broadcast anchors at NBC,
CBS, and CNN, journalists at the New York Times and Wall Street
Journal, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the traditional telephone
industry technical workers at AT&T and Cingular Wireless. Further,
more than 2000 collective bargaining agreements in the U.S. are
attributed to CWA.
Recently, other organizations have shown
interest in organizing interpreters. In some cases these are the
very organizations who declined to help us because the task of passing
legislation to reclassify interpreters as employees seemed insurmountable,
or just too expensive. CWA not only took on this challenge, but
has allowed interpreters to call the shots in the legislative process
and will provide interpreters the opportunity to decide how our
needs will best be met. CFI and BACI are confident that CWA's expertise,
experience and status as a major nationwide AFL-CIO union will be
indispensable as we embark on negotiations in the near future.
By choosing CWA, interpreters will also be
choosing CFI/BACI. Together we can meet the challenge of successfully
negotiating our first contract as employees and finally make our
collective voice heard.
|