| November 14, 2006
What we thought was meaningful progress in recent
meetings has seriously bogged down over a new
development that could result in unequal pay for employees.
The issue is this: the Judicial Council has under consideration
a raise in independent contractor rates. The independent contractors
are asking for the federal rate, which would constitute a 26%
increase.
In bargaining, Region 2 has said that the maximum they can
give us in this reopener is 3% now and 3% next year if we give
up the option to bargain over wages next year. Region 1 (LA
Superior Court) imposed a 2.5% increase earlier this year-
something the Union did not agree to- and our contract is still
open with unfair labor practice charges pending. In Regions
3 and 4 interpreters are locked-in to 3% maximum increases.
We are of course concerned about a disparity
between contractor and employee pay. But our position is
clear: contractors and employees are both underpaid in the
state courts and we support an increase in
contractor and employee pay to match federal rates and salaries.
Please see two attached presentations made by CFI at the Judicial
Council’s November 7 meeting on the contractor rate issue.
Members at our November 4 Region 2 meeting
were very concerned about this new development and made
it clear to your bargaining committee that if equity in wages
with contractors could not be safeguarded we should continue
to negotiate and mobilize.
At our November 9 bargaining session, we tried
to find a reasonable compromise and close a deal. We
proposed a 4% increase each year and the ability to reopen
on wages immediately should the independent contractors be
granted an increase in excess of ours. The lawyer speaking
for the region said his “principals” rejected this
proposal. His principals were described as the executive officers
of the 15 courts in the region. This includes Kiri Torre, the
CEO of the largest employer of interpreters in the Region and
a member of the AOC subcommittee that will make the recommendation
on the independent contractor increase.
The Region also renewed the proposal to expand
unit work to include telephone and counter work-something that
had been dropped from their last package proposal. We responded
that a settlement
acceptable to Region 2 employees would not include this inappropriate
change in our work. The session was then recessed and a further
meeting has not been set.
We are committed to continue negotiating
to reach a fair settlement. At the same time, given the courts’ refusal to recognize
the skills and value of court interpreters- both contractors
and employees- it looks like it will take more pressure and
organizing to get to a fair settlement. Here’s your first
assignment: wear your buttons. Don’t have one? Contact
your steward or other courthouse mobilizer.
This is a very interesting moment. With contracts open in
Regions 1 and 2 and a proposed contractor rate increase in
the air- the time is ripe for court interpreters- regardless
of status- to join forces.
Your Bargaining Committee:
Union Representative:
|